Current time: 11-21-2017, 09:57 PM Hello There, Guest! (LoginRegister)


Post Reply 
 
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Votes - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Jagger Formula Update Part-1
02-16-2016, 10:06 PM
Post: #1
Big Grin Jagger Formula Update Part-1
If there is one thing Internet Search Engine Marketers and site owners fear - it is a major formula upgrade, particularly by Google. Well, much as we may like it never to happen, its here. Get further on the affiliated wiki - Browse this hyperlink: home page. Google has done an important algorithm update, nick called Jagger update series.

Google does minor algorithm improvements nearly o-n a monthly basis and once in a while, it uses a major algorithm update. The final important Google algorithm update happened in November 2003 called the Florida update, which produced quite a stir with website ratings. To know more, read our article on Google Florida Algo Update.

Like the Florida update, the Jagger update has done the much dreaded blender act. It has churned the top-ranking web sites and made it in-to a listing of unrecognizable pulp. To explore additional information, consider peeping at: http://www.yellowpages.com/avon-ct/mip/b...503239401/.

Google is a hot-favorite between the web community searching for information. Identify further about What is IMEI? by visiting our cogent essay. Most believe that the search results have been very appropriate. It would be consequently safe to assume that what-ever protocol Google has, works just fine. So why does Google need to re-engineer its perfect-looking algo so dramatically? Has it not heard the saying do not repair what aint broke? From Google's viewpoint, the reason why is simple and appropriate. Identify more on our favorite related site by visiting read. Well, to begin with, net is ever-evolving and the algo always must be modified to be able to supply the best-of results. Google made an algo, which it believes will reward good sites and rank them well for its viewers.

Google, similar to other search engines, keeps this algo a closely guarded secret to prevent it from being used. Nevertheless, the SEO group is continually at work trying to rank their web sites well. Using determined anxiety, sensible thinking, specific tests and extensive trial-and-error methods, they slowly figure out what the algorithm likes and dislikes. Armed with this knowledge, it's not hard to work on sites to rank them full of SERP (Search Engine Result Pages), whether the website deserves to rank at the very top or not. This type of formula abuse leads to less-than desirable' sites displacing great sites from the top ranks, polluting the Google index. Consequently, following a Kaizen philosophy, Google has to re-engineer its calculations to keep, what it feels are bad sites, from its top ranks. Normally, important protocol updates upset the present high-ranking websites & delivers lots of Search Engine Optimization professionals back-to their work-bench in order to begin once again.

What is interesting to see could be the timing of the protocol upgrade. When Google updated its algorithm in November 2003, there were large-scale claims by website owners that Google intentionally upset the ranks of popular websites right before the Christmas shopping season to drive them into buying Google AdWords paid advertising to be able to preserve visitors traffic. While Google claims that the algo update decisions aren't influenced by the AdWords staff, it is hard to understand why they would once more choose a important moment just before Christmas buying season to update their formula. The limits are extremely high and its business after-all. Google earned $1.57 Billion in Q3 of 2005. If 2003 pre-Christmas algorithm update effect is any indication, I calculate that Google would record revenues of around $2.05 Billion in Q4 of 2005..
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 


Forum Jump:


User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)


Contact Us | Your Website | Return to Top | Return to Content | Lite (Archive) Mode | RSS Syndication